Chapter 10: Sex, Gender, and Identity

Welcome to Last Minute Lecture.

This free chapter overview is designed to help students review and understand key concepts.

These summaries supplement, not replace, the original textbook and may not be redistributed or resold.

For complete coverage, always consult the official text.

You know those phrases like, boys will be boys, or maybe that's just how men and women are.

We hear them all the time.

But honestly, human identity, when you really start digging into it, is way more intricate,

diverse, and just fascinating than those little sayings let on.

Absolutely, much more complex.

So today we're doing a deep dive into sex, gender, and identity.

And our mission really is to unpack these concepts that get mixed up so often using insights straight from this academic text we've been looking at.

We want to reveal the incredible, well, diversity and nuance of how humans experience these things across different societies.

And this isn't about getting lost in, you know, tons of jargon.

It's meant to be your shortcut to really grasping this rich kind of layered tapestry of human identity.

We'll move beyond the typical Western binary views, exploring the biological side, the social constructions, and importantly, individual choice.

And what's often missed, I think, and what's really interesting, is just how often we mix up these terms, sex and gender, just in everyday talk.

So to get clear, we really need to start with the basic definitions, like the chapter does.

In anthropology,

sex is seen as a biological classification.

It's determined by reproductive anatomy, basically, whether someone's born with a penis or a vagina.

Simple enough, right?

And straightforward.

But then gender,

that's different.

It's an identity.

It's the social role someone plays in their society.

So it's a social thing, the behavioral construct.

It's shaped by culture, not just biology.

That distinction feels really key.

And okay, here's where it gets even more interesting for me.

We tend to think of biological sex as strictly binary male or female, full stop.

But the reality, it seems, is a bit more complex.

It really is.

I mean, a doctor usually assigns sex at birth based on what they see.

But the text mentions these uncommon cases where individuals are born with, well, a mixture of anatomy.

Exactly.

And there's such a contrast there.

In many traditional societies, these individuals, while uncommon, were seen as perfectly normal, sometimes even powerful or revered.

But then you look at standard Western medical practice.

It's often quite different.

Doctors might decide which anatomy seems dominant, sometimes even surgically removing other sex organs, and maybe not even consulting parents fully.

So you could end up with situations where, say, someone assigned female at birth has hidden internal tests,

or someone assigned male has internal ovaries.

And this ambiguity might not even be noticed until puberty hits.

And puberty, of course, that's when everything changes hormonally.

Precisely.

You get that surge of testosterone and estrogen, which, remember, everyone has in different amounts, and they start shaping the body.

Developing facial hair, muscle mass, changes in hip shape, breast development.

And all those secondary characteristics.

Exactly.

And this mix of visible and maybe hidden anatomy plus the hormones creates this wide variation in sexual characteristics and expression.

So you might get individuals who appear, say, masculine, but are biologically female, or the other way around.

And yeah, that can understandably lead to some confusion about identity down the line.

Okay, so if biological sex itself has these nuances,

then gender being the social construct must be even more fluid.

I mean, it's defined by society, often influenced by the sex assigned at birth, but clearly not locked into it.

Definitely not locked in.

And we see these powerful examples, right?

Female warriors, male wives roles that in some societies aren't just like footnotes, but recognized, respected, maybe even revered.

Absolutely.

And even in, you know, modern Western societies, we see shifts, like house husbands taking on primary caregiving roles.

It challenges those traditional expectations, even if society hasn't always had a formal recognized category for it in the same way.

But globally, the variation is just profound.

Look at some Inuit societies.

Families might train kids in roles linked to both sexes, sometimes even cross -dressing them until puberty.

And this often came from a belief in supernatural transformations.

That's fascinating.

And the text mentions two spirits in some Native American cultures.

These individuals could do both men's and women's work, and were sometimes even taken as spouses by males.

That points to a really unique and respected place in society, doesn't it?

It really There are even records of young males being purposefully raised as females to be concubines for men.

These examples just fundamentally push back against our usual Western binary way of thinking about gender.

Yeah, they really do.

Okay, so this naturally leads us into thinking about sexual preference.

The text defines us as the combination of attraction to others.

We usually categorize this as heterosexual attraction to the opposite sex, bisexual attraction to both sexes, and homosexual attraction to the same sex, so gay or lesbian.

And the key question that comes up is, are these things rare?

Are they abnormal?

Yeah.

The text is pretty clear.

Yeah.

These preferences show up in basically all but the very smallest societies that are considered perfectly normal.

And we even see similar patterns in animals and plants.

Right.

And the source material in Spotlight 10 .1 gives this amazing deep dive into evolving sexual identity in the South Pacific.

Oh, the section was incredible.

Looking at Polynesia, Micronesia, Melanesia.

Right.

You've got early European accounts, but also Margaret Mead's work from the 1920s and later research confirming it, showing that generally people there were quite relaxed and open about their sexuality.

Mead even noticed Samoan adolescent girls seem to have less stress and anxiety moving into adulthood compared to American girls, which suggests maybe a more integrated way of handling that transition.

Although the text does add a little note that Mead's field work being so immersive caused a bit of controversy back then about her level of participation kind of reflects the norms for women researchers at the time.

Yeah, that's a good point.

But what really stands out are the specific practices.

Little kids were seen as asexual, but as they got older, open masturbation, even group contests was common right into adulthood.

Wow.

Okay.

And often by age 10, kids were engaging in intercourse.

Sometimes boys had relations with other boys if girls weren't around or high status men might keep younger males as sexual partners.

And then after puberty, it shifted a bit.

Mostly heterosexual.

Yeah.

But bisexual relationships were definitely known and accepted.

They had group naked dancing that could lead to sex, sometimes even group sex parties and extramarital affairs.

Heterosexual ones were pretty common and accepted as long as certain social rules usually about status were followed.

Okay.

So a very different landscape.

And what about transgender identities?

They were there too.

Some men took on feminine roles identified as transgender and they were just accepted.

They were respected, sometimes had important ritual roles.

And while it was rare, women who preferred women, what we'd call lesbian and men who primarily preferred men, what we call homosexual existed, they were seen as uncommon, but not like shunned.

So if things were so open, what changed at all?

Well, Europeans arrived, colonial powers, Christian missionaries,

they brought their own often puritanical views and that led to suppressing these traditional identities, outlying homosexuality and sadly also spreading venereal diseases, which added another layer of problems.

But it's not a closed chapter, is it?

No, not entirely.

More recently, as global attitudes have shifted a bit, there's been some revival of traditional practices, but it's complicated.

Homosexuality is still illegal in many of those island societies today.

Right.

And the text makes the point that while Western societies might seem different on the surface, similar kinds of sexual behaviors happen here too, just maybe later in life and often kept well hidden.

That's a crucial point.

Okay.

We've talked about sex and gender, how they operate, but what about when someone's inner sense of self just doesn't match up with what society expects based on their birth sex?

That brings us to gender affirmation.

This is the process where someone asserts their gender identity.

It generally involves three steps.

First, recognizing your own identity.

Second, expressing that identity to others.

And third, actually assuming that gender role in society.

And that expression part can be really tough, right?

Especially if society disapproves.

The text gives the example of like a male corporate executive who might be a cross dresser, but feels they have to hide that completely because of social judgment.

Exactly.

And this opens up the huge range of diverse gender identities.

We've mentioned transgender individuals, people whose gender identity differs from the sex assigned at birth.

And remember, that's separate from sexual preference.

That you have eunuchs, males who are castrated for specific social roles like guarding harems.

That was a practice found all over the world historically.

And indigenous Australian societies.

Wow.

They recognized four common genders, masculine, feminine, neuter, and get this, useful plants.

I know.

Isn't that amazing?

It really is.

And by classifying plants as a gender, they actually gain the status of non -human personhood.

It just shows how central those plants were to their culture.

It absolutely does.

Now, looking at Western industrialized societies,

historically, there wasn't much tolerance or understanding for different sexualities or genders.

Things have improved recently in places like the U .S.

legalizing same sex marriage, more openness to the LGBTQIA plus community.

Yeah, definitely some progress.

But these changes often face pushback from social conservatives.

It's still an ongoing conversation this whole debate about what's considered normal.

And that whole all -gender bathrooms discussion, the text kind of cuts through it by pointing out, hey, they're not exactly new.

Right.

If you've been on a plane, traveled in Europe, used an outhouse or a porta potty or gone camping, you've likely used an all -gender bathroom.

It's about context.

But again, it's not universal acceptance, is it?

The text mentions Peru in 2024, classifying transgender identities as mental health problems, shows how much variation there still is globally.

A really powerful, longstanding example of a recognized third gender is the hijras of India.

These are generally eunuchs, often voluntarily castrated, who dresses women and form an officially recognized gender category.

And they're seen as having special power.

Yeah, they're believed to possess a kind of spiritual power, could be good or bad, which connects to that idea of animatism, you know, the belief that even nonliving things can have a life force.

So what do they do in society?

They play a key role at big ceremonies like births and weddings.

They come to bless the participants.

You know, they're arriving because they clap loudly and they sort of demand payment for their blessing.

Demand it.

Yeah.

And if people refuse, the threat is that they might expose their genitals.

Since seeing eunuchs' genitals is considered super embarrassing for non -hijras, people usually pay up.

It's this really interesting mix of ritual power and social leverage.

Though interestingly, some hijras aren't actually castrated, they're cross -dressers.

So sometimes their bluff might get called.

And some also work as prostitutes.

Okay.

Shifting gears a bit to something absolutely fundamental for any society.

Reproduction.

I mean, without it, the society doesn't continue.

Pretty basic necessity, yeah.

The text even mentions the maternal instinct as one of the few instincts we consistently see in humans.

And the whole journey.

It's complex.

Sexual activity, fertilization, hoping for a viable pregnancy.

But miscarriages those spontaneous abortions before 12 weeks and stillbirths after 12 weeks are actually pretty common.

Sadly, yes.

The stats from the West are sobering.

Something like only 17 % of all pregnancies end up resulting in someone who lives long enough to reproduce themselves.

That low.

Yeah.

And maternal and infant mortality rates vary hugely.

They're often tragically high in traditional societies without modern medicine, but also still worryingly high for non -white groups in the US, often due to issues with

And reproduction isn't just about birth, right?

It's tied to all the behaviors around it.

Feeding, protecting, educating kids.

Exactly.

Making sure they survive and become part of the next generation.

Societies also have ways to manage pregnancy.

Sometimes it's avoidance, abstinence, contraception, careful timing.

Mobile hunter -gatherers, for instance, often space births by two to four years, usually while a mother is still nursing.

And abortions.

Some traditional societies did have knowledge of plants or substances used for abortion.

And births themselves are usually assisted by a midwife, maybe a shaman or doctor.

But there's always that risk of mortality for the mother, the infant, or both.

The text also mentions infanticide.

That sounds harsh.

It does.

It's defined as killing an infant, typically if they're born with a severe defect or if there just isn't enough food to support them.

But what's really crucial to understand from their perspective is the belief often tied to it.

Reincarnation.

The idea is that the infant soul isn't lost forever.

It will just be reborn later.

So within that worldview, it's not seen as a permanent end, but more like a temporary pause or redirection.

That context is so important.

Okay, let's talk about social identities.

The text says our identity has many layers.

Like, you're born into a family and that family has its own identity, status, rank, whatever.

And within that family, you have daughter, cousin, nephew, and each role comes with expected behaviors and responsibilities.

And a really big moment in establishing this social identity is the naming ceremony.

This isn't just giving a name.

It's a major event that officially marks the person as a member of the family and the society.

It formalizes their birthright.

When does naming happen?

It varies.

Could be before birth, right at birth, or sometimes even a year or more later.

And here's where it connects back, isn't it?

If a child isn't named.

Exactly.

In many societies, particularly those with high infant mortality or tough conditions, an unnamed child isn't yet considered a full person.

This worldview, again, can facilitate infanticide.

It's not seen as murder in that context because the child hasn't achieved full human status yet, which fits with that reincarnation belief.

It really shows how deeply cultural the idea of personhood is.

Wow.

Okay, so you're automatically part of the society you're born into.

When you get inculturated, you learn the language, the religion, the basic worldview.

Right.

And your societal identity is tied up with things like your age, your sex, your rank or status, your job.

Some of those change over your life, obviously.

You might also belong to different social groups or sodalities.

And in bigger societies.

You often get subgroups identified like ethnic groups or what people call races.

And these identities are often announced visually through clothing, decorations, maybe body modifications.

Okay, let's tackle race.

This is a big one and often really misunderstood.

Hugely misunderstood.

The scientific fact, as the text states clearly, is that humans are one single population.

One species.

Almost sapiens, sapiens.

Genetically, we're virtually identical.

So all those variations we see.

Things like height, body shape, even blood type or how well we see or hear.

Those are usually adaptations to different environments over long periods, not fundamental biological divisions.

But people focus on visible stuff like skin color.

Exactly.

Those visible features have been used as a basis to group people into races,

but biologically.

The text says the concept of race is nearly meaningless.

It's fundamentally a social construction, generally based on some bias of the classifier against the classifier.

A social construction, but one with huge cultural impact.

Math of impact, yeah.

And mostly for negative reasons, like enabling oppression.

It's a stark reminder of how cultural ideas, even without a biological basis, can shape reality in powerful, often damaging ways.

So if race is socially constructed, how does that differ from an ethnic group?

Good question.

An ethnic group is defined as a community within a larger society that sees itself and is seen by others as distinct.

This distinction usually comes from shared ancestry, a commonplace of origin, language, customs, maybe specific foods, traditional beliefs.

So they maintain some distinct culture within the bigger society.

Right.

Members often keep their original language, religion, food traditions.

Think of all the ethnic restaurants that enrich our societies.

They acculturate, meaning they adopt aspects of the larger parent society, but they do it selectively, keeping parts of their own heritage while blending in other ways.

And we see this all over.

In the U .S., you have hundreds of Native American groups, often kind of fourth world peoples, plus groups like Vietnamese Americans, Italian Americans, Mexican Americans,

countless examples.

And the text gives the Amish as a specific example.

They're a traditional Anabaptist Christian group, mostly in the northeastern U .S., living alongside related groups like Mennonites.

What makes them distinct?

Well, they're often English and Pennsylvania Dutch, which is German dialect.

Their core values emphasize simplicity, hard work, cooperation.

They run their own schools, generally rejecting what they call worldly knowledge, and a lot of modern tech phones, TV, radio, grid electricity.

They famously use horse -drawn buggies for transport.

If you picture figure 10 .1, it shows exactly that in Amish family in their buggy.

It's a very visible symbol of their distinct way of life.

That really illustrates the concept.

Now, Spotlight 10 .2 takes us somewhere completely different, the African Burial Ground in New York City.

Yeah, this is an incredible story.

Back in 1991, during construction work in lower Manhattan, they uncovered this 18th century cemetery.

It was known back then as the Negroes Burying Ground, and they estimate 10 ,000 to 20 ,000 people were buried there.

That's huge.

So what happened?

Construction stopped, thankfully, and archaeologists came in.

They excavated about 400 burials.

Some were poor whites, some prisoners from the revolution, but the vast majority were enslaved Africans.

And this was in New York?

Yes, which was a revelation for many.

It showed that slavery wasn't just a southern thing in the 1700s.

It was deeply entrenched in the north, too.

New York City actually had more enslaved people than anywhere else except South Carolina at the time.

So archaeology here really filled in blanks, left by biased historical records.

What did the remains tell them about life for these people?

It painted a grim picture.

Very high childhood mortality.

Almost half the bodies were kids under 12.

That points to poor health, poor nutrition.

And the adult skeletons showed clear signs of intense physical labor, of being literally worked to death.

It completely contradicted that old narrative about slavery being somehow more humane in the north.

Sobering stuff.

But there was more to it than just the hardship, right?

Absolutely.

And this is maybe the more important lesson, as the text says.

The burials showed an incredible persistence of African culture, even under the horrors of enslavement.

They found specific burial traditions, offerings left with the dead, bodies oriented in particular ways, evidence of indigenous African religions being practiced,

distinct material culture, food remnants, links to oral traditions, even language elements.

Wow.

Resilience.

Incredible resilience.

The site is now protected.

It's a historical district, a national historic landmark, and the African Burial Ground National Monument.

Figure 10 .2 in the text shows a picture of the memorial there today.

It's a really powerful place of remembrance.

Okay, let's shift slightly to subcultures.

How are they defined?

Subcultures are basically smaller groups within a larger society that have their own distinctive identity.

They'll have their own standards, their own ways of behaving, but they generally still share the main standards of the wider society.

Like the motorcycle club example.

Exactly.

They might have unique dress codes or outlooks, but they're still operating within the broad norms.

Other examples the text gives are things like the New Age movement, surfers, cowboys, the military, professional athletes.

Lots of groups carve out their own little niches.

Can subcultures become more separate?

Sometimes.

The text mentions things like street gangs or drug cartels.

They can develop their own complex systems, administration, healthcare, education, almost like many societies.

But crucially, the larger nation state usually still views them as criminal organizations.

So there's that tension.

Right.

And that brings us finally to personal identity.

Yes.

This is made up of lots of different elements, our sex, our gender, our parts of it, but it's layered onto all those group identities we've talked about.

And sometimes personal identity might be hidden, especially if it clashes with what society expects or accepts.

But we have some control.

A lot of control, actually.

This is where agency comes in, that fundamental ability we have to make our own choices about our lives and identities.

Your biological sex at birth isn't initially your choice, obviously, but as an adult, you might make choices to change or affirm aspects of it.

And the text points out that Western societies often mushing sex and gender together makes it harder to understand these different identity choices.

It really does.

Personal identity also includes your status, your family roles, your profession.

All these pieces make up the individual you.

But it can get complicated when identities are contested.

How so?

Well, think about someone from a fourth world group.

Do they primarily identify as indigenous or as a citizen of the larger nation states, say, Indio versus Mexican?

Those choices can cause conflict, both within the group and with the outside society.

And what about wannabes?

Ah, yes.

People who want to self -identify as belonging to an ethnic group, they weren't born into like someone claiming to be Native American without any actual tribal connection.

This is usually really resented by the actual members of the group and rarely recognized, because tribes often have very specific rules about membership tied to ancestry and culture.

That makes sense.

OK, this whole discussion of identity, how we express it, leads perfectly into the last spotlight, body decoration and alteration.

Which is incredibly common, right?

Found in almost every society.

And the main goal is usually communication, conveying information, getting noticed visually.

The reasons seem endless.

Announcing you belong to a certain group, a clan, maybe a gang, recording history or tradition, showing off wealth or power, signaling if you're married or not, commemorating something important or just, you know, art or fashion.

Exactly.

Look at Polynesian tattoos.

Figure 10 .3 shows these amazing complex tattoos on a man.

They're not just decoration.

They're like visual resumes showing status, family ties, personal history.

They can even encode oral traditions.

The text calls them talking tattoos which reminds me of that movie Moana.

Oh, yeah, that's a great connection.

And of course, a big part of it is attracting others, right?

Emphasizing features considered desirable.

Absolutely.

Though what counts as beautiful is super variable across cultures and even between individuals.

And these modifications can be permanent or temporary.

True, permanent.

Tattoos are the most common, right?

Pigment under the skin.

The text mentions Ertzi, the Iceman, 5 ,300 years old, had 61 tattoos and they think his were maybe medical, like acupuncture points.

Yeah, so just a really ancient, practical purpose, not just decoration.

Other permanent forms include scarring, deliberately cutting or burning the skin to create patterns.

Figure 10 .4 shows an example of that kind of scarification on a man.

Very striking.

Then there's piercing nose, lips, ears, elsewhere.

Circumcision, which is super common in the U .S.

and more extreme things like sub incision that cut on the underside of the penis in some indigenous Australian ceremonies or filing teeth, even trephination, cutting holes in the skull.

Wow.

And today in the West, we have things like plastic surgery, implants, liposuction, fillers.

Those count too.

Definitely permanent alterations aimed at achieving a certain aesthetic.

And then you have the temporary stuff.

Makeup, clothes, jewelry, how you wear your hair.

Face paint, used daily or just for ceremonies.

Clothing is a huge visual signal.

Figure 10 .5 shows some really vibrant Maasai decorative clothing instantly tells you something about identity and culture.

Clothes can show status royalty versus commoner or have specific uses, like a wedding dress.

Even how much clothing is worn, a concept of nudity is culturally defined.

Could be small coverings, a full burka, or something like a phallocarp that reads sheaths some men wear in New Guinea.

And hair.

It's such a big deal visually.

We used to think long hair are female in the West, but that's changed.

In Polynesia and Native America, long hair on men was often a sign of status or desirability.

And women's hairstyles often carry deep meaning.

Figure 10 .6 shows an unmarried Hopi girl with that amazing squash blossom hairstyle, those big whorls on the sides.

It's a symbol of fertility.

And yeah, it does look remarkably like Princess Leia's iconic buns.

It really does.

Okay.

What an incredible exploration.

Just to quickly recap the biggest takeaways, we've firmly established that sex is the biological classification while gender is that social role and identity.

They're distinct, but obviously connected.

Right.

And sexual preference, heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual is about attraction.

And it's a normal part of human diversity across societies.

We learned that identity is this complex, multilayered thing shaped by our family, our society, but also crucially by our own individual agency, our power to choose.

And we absolutely busted the myth of biological race.

It's a social construct.

Instead, we talked about ethnic groups and subcultures as ways people define belonging within larger societies.

We touched on reproduction as essential and the diverse, sometimes difficult ways societies handle it, including the deep meaning behind naming ceremonies and their connection in some contexts to infanticide.

And finally, that whole fascinating world of body decoration and alteration, tattoos, scarring, clothing, hair, is this ancient and ongoing way humans communicate who they are.

So all those key terms, agency, ethnic group, gender identity, infanticide, race, sex, sexual preference, subculture, and transgender.

They all give us tools to understand this incredible human variety.

So what's the big picture for you listening to this?

If we step back, really understanding these differences, these distinctions, it doesn't just add to our knowledge base.

It can foster hopefully more empathy, more acceptance for the huge spectrum of human experience out there.

It's about realizing that normal is just so much broader, so much more varied, and so deeply shaped by culture than many of us maybe grew up thinking.

Absolutely.

The sheer diversity and fluidity of how humans express identity across time and place.

It's really something to think about.

Thank you so much for joining us on this deep dive into sex, gender, and identity.

We hope you leave with maybe a fresh perspective and a bit deeper understanding of the amazing complex human story.