Chapter 15: Dilutive Securities and Earnings per Share

Welcome to Last Minute Lecture.

This free chapter overview is designed to help students review and understand key concepts.

These summaries supplement not replace the original textbook and may not be redistributed or resold.

For complete coverage, always consult the official text.

What really drives a company's value?

I mean, is it just about those big revenue numbers or the profit margins we always hear about?

Good question.

Or is there something deeper, maybe more fundamental going on under the surface of the financials?

Exactly.

Today, we're doing a deep dive into the bedrock of corporate finance,

stockholders' equity, and also dilutive securities and earnings per share.

Two really key areas.

Right.

Our mission here is to kind of pull back the curtain on these core accounting concepts, hopefully give you some of those aha moments and show you how they practically shape a company's financial health and its future.

Honestly, for anyone who wants to truly understand how companies tick, whether you're managing investments, running a business, or you're just really curious, grasping these elements is absolutely essential.

So stockholders' equity.

You called it the bedrock.

What are we defining here?

Think of it as the residual interest in a company's assets.

Basically, it's what's left for the owners after all the company's debts and liabilities are settled.

It's the core of that fundamental accounting equation.

Assets minus liabilities equals stockholders' equity.

And today, we'll shed some light on what that really means.

Okay.

Let's unpack this then.

Beyond that core equation,

assets minus liabilities.

Yeah.

What else is it?

Well, that's the heart of it, but it goes by a few names.

You might hear shareholders' equity, owners' equity, corporate capital, sometimes net assets.

Right.

It represents the value that the stockholders have put in, plus the profits the company has kept and reinvested.

Importantly, it's not a claim to specific things like a building or cash.

It's more a claim against a portion of the total assets and its value.

Well, it fluctuates based on profits and performance.

So why is this residual interest so incredibly important in the real world?

Why should our listener care?

Well, think about the scale of some companies today.

Apple, Microsoft, Tesla, Amazon.

Their market values are bigger than the GDP of many countries.

It's staggering.

Absolutely.

Take Amazon, for instance.

Back in 2020, their balance sheet showed stockholders' equity to book value around $93 billion.

But its market value, nearly $1 .6 trillion.

Wow.

That's a huge difference.

It is.

And that gap highlights something critical.

Investors value stuff way beyond the balance sheet numbers.

Things like innovation, brand, customer loyalty,

maybe even sustainability efforts.

Makes sense.

So understanding how companies get financed, common stock, preferred stock, how they distribute valued dividends, buybacks, and how they reinvest earnings.

Well, that's vital for everyone.

Investors, creditors, management, regulators.

It tells you what the market really thinks a company is worth.

Okay.

So to enable all this financial activity, this massive scale,

what kind of legal structure usually allows for that?

That would typically be the corporate form.

In the U .S., you mainly see C corporations and S corporations for profit businesses.

Right.

C and S Corp.

C corporations are the big ones, like Microsoft.

They face double taxation.

The company pays tax.

Then shareholders pay tax on dividends.

Yeah.

But crucially, no limit on the number of stockholders.

S corporations are usually smaller, taxed more like partnerships.

Income flows through to owners, avoiding double tax.

But they're limited, usually to 100 stockholders.

So C Corp.

dominate the big leagues.

Oh, absolutely.

Fewer in number, maybe.

But they dominate revenue, assets, market value.

It's the structure that lets them scale up massively.

So what are the big draws then?

Why choose the corporate form, especially the C Corp.?

Several powerful advantages.

First, and this is huge, limited liability.

If you invest in, say, Johnson & Johnson, your personal assets are safe.

You only risk your investment.

That's a big deal.

Definitely.

Second, it's a separate legal entity.

It can sign contracts, borrow money, sue, be sued, all in its own name.

Third, easy capital formation.

Issuing tradable shares makes raising huge sums much simpler than other structures.

Fourth, unlimited life.

Companies like Disney can theoretically last forever.

Ownership changes don't end them.

Fifth, transferability of ownership.

You can sell your Google shares in seconds, right?

No complex approvals needed.

And finally, professional management.

You can invest in complex fields like biotech without being an expert yourself.

You trust the managers.

Those are some pretty compelling advantages.

But like you said, there are always two sides.

What are the downsides?

True.

The main ones include that double taxation for C Corp.

we mentioned can really hit investor returns.

Setting one up is also expensive and consuming lots of paperwork, legal stuff, regulations, bureaucracy.

Exactly.

And they are heavily regulated by government bodies, which means compliance costs.

Lastly, that separation of ownership and management.

While it allows pros to run things, it can lead to agency problems if management schools don't align perfectly with shareholders.

Like focusing on short -term appearances over long -term value.

Precisely.

Sometimes accounting choices might reflect that tension.

Okay, so given all that, what are the actual pieces we'd see within the stockholders equity section on a balance sheet?

What are the components?

You'll typically find common stock, preferred stock, additional paid -in capital,

retained earnings, treasury stock, and accumulated other comprehensive income.

Got it.

Each one tells a part of the story about the owner's stake and how it's changed.

Let's focus on common stock first.

What rights and features usually come with that?

Common stock is the basic ownership.

Key things.

The right to vote for the board of directors.

Okay, so you get a say.

Yeah.

You also have a residual claim on assets, meaning if the company liquidates, common stockholders are last in line after debts and preferred stock are paid.

The leftovers, basically.

Kind of, yeah.

Often there's a preemptive right letting you buy new shares to avoid having your ownership percentage diluted.

Oh,

interesting.

Common stock usually has a perpetual term, no end date, and the right to receive dividends, though those aren't guaranteed.

Right.

Dividends can vary.

And some companies, like Alphabet or Meta, use dual -class shares, different voting rights, often letting founders keep control even without majority ownership.

Okay, how do companies account for issuing common stock?

Especially this par value thing.

It sounds a bit old -fashioned.

You're right.

It often is a bit old -fashioned.

Par value is usually a tiny nominal amount, like PepsiCo's one euro.

It has almost nothing to do with the stock's actual market price.

You would well have it.

It's mostly a legal thing, a holdover.

When stock is issued, the company records the cash received.

A tiny bit, the par value amount, goes into the common stock account.

Okay.

Anything received above par goes into paid -in capital in excess of par, or sometimes called additional paid -in capital.

Ah, so that's the premium investors pay.

Exactly.

If a stock with one dollar par is sold for ten dollars, one dollar goes to common stock, nine dollars goes to paid -in capital in excess of par.

Simple distinction, but key for reading the equity section.

Like in the Trip Nerd example, issuing 4 ,000 shares of one dollar par stock for ten dollars each means $40 ,000 cash comes in, $4 ,000 goes to common stock, and $36 ,000 to paid -in capital in excess of par.

Got it.

What if a company sells different things together, like common and preserved stock, for one price?

How do they split that up?

Good question.

That's a lonesome sale.

The trick is allocating that single price fairly.

If they know the fair value of each security, they use the proportional method.

Based on relative values.

Right.

Like the Twilla example.

Common worth $20, preferred worth $12k, sold together for $30k.

You'd allocate $18 ,750 to common and $11 ,250 to preferred based on those proportions.

And if they don't know all the fair values?

Then they use the incremental method.

They use the known fair values first, subtract those from the total price, and whatever's left gets assigned to the security with the unknown value.

Makes sense.

Allocate what you know first.

Precisely.

The goal is always fair representation.

What about issuing stock for something other than cash, like property, or maybe services?

The general rule there is, record it at the fair value of the stock giving up, or the fair value of the non -cash item received, whichever is more clearly determinable, more reliable.

Okay.

Use the better measure.

Right.

You want accurate valuation.

Historically, this was an area prone to abuse, like watered stock, where assets were overvalued.

Good accounting tries to prevent that.

And the costs involved in issuing stock.

Legal fees, underwriting fees.

How are those handled?

Those direct costs aren't expensed like regular operating costs.

No, they're treated as a reduction of the proceeds from the stock issue itself.

So they reduce the amount credited to paid in capital in excess of par.

So it reduces the capital raised, essentially.

Exactly.

It's seen as a cost of financing, not operating.

Like in the steady shot example, $804 ,000 in issuance costs would be debited directly to APIC.

Okay.

Let's switch gears to preferred stock.

What makes it different from common and why issue it?

Preferred stock, well, it has preferences.

Usually preference for dividends, they get paid before common stockholders.

Okay.

First dibs on dividends.

Right.

And often preference in liquidation paid after creditors, but before common stockholders if things go south.

But a key difference, preferred stock is usually non -voting.

So no say in management.

Generally, no.

Companies might issue it to fund specific projects without adding debt, or to raise capital without diluting the voting control of common shareholders.

Plus, missing a preferred dividend isn't a default like missing a bond payment.

Gives them flexibility.

Interesting.

What are some specific features preferred stock might have?

Several variations exist.

Cumulative preferred stock is common.

If a dividend is skipped or passed.

Passed.

Yeah, not declared that year.

It becomes a dividend in arrears.

It accumulates and must be paid later before any common dividends can be paid.

So they do have to pay eventually, even if it's late.

Yes, for cumulative preferred.

It's disclosed in the notes, but not a formal liability until declared.

Then there's participating preferred stock.

Where holders might get more than their fixed dividend if the company does really well.

Sharing extra profits with common stockholders.

Extra upside.

Sometimes.

Convertible preferred stock lets holders swap their preferred shares for common stock at a set ratio.

Offers potential equity upside.

And how's that conversion accounted for?

Using the book value method.

You just debit the preferred stock accounts and credit the common stock accounts.

No gain or loss is recognized.

It's just moving equity around internally.

The Marinelli example shows this.

It's okay.

No gain or loss.

Right.

And finally, callable preferred stock means the company can buy back the shares at a set price.

Offers them refinancing flexibility.

And sometimes you see redeemable preferred stock where the shareholder might have the option.

Or it's mandatory on a certain date.

That gets complex classification -wise.

Sometimes ending up as temporary equity.

Or even a liability if redemption is certain.

Okay.

Shifting again to something we hear constantly about.

Companies buying back their own shares.

Treasury stock.

This seems huge lately.

What's driving it?

Oh, it's massive.

Over $3 trillion spent just between 2010 and 2020.

Several reasons.

Maybe management thinks the stock is undervalued.

Warren Buffett does this.

I'm buying when it's cheap.

Exactly.

Buybacks also offer more distribution flexibility than dividends, which are hard to cut.

They can offset dilution from employee stock plans.

Can be used to maintain control against takeovers.

And significantly, they boost earnings per share, EPS, by reducing the number of shares outstanding.

Fewer shares in the denominator means higher EPS, all else equal.

Ah, the EPS boost.

See, that mentioned a lot.

Companies like Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft do a lot of this.

Huge amounts, yes.

Along with big banks like JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America.

So how does the accounting work?

Is treasury stock an asset?

Absolutely not.

That's a key point.

It's not an asset.

It's a Contra stockholders' equity account.

Contra equity.

Because when a company buys back shares, cash goes down, asset decrease, and treasury stock goes up, which reduces total equity.

So it shrinks the equity base.

Right.

Now, if they resell that treasury stock above what they paid, the excess goes into paid -in capital from treasury stock.

Okay, a separate capital account.

Yes.

If they sell it below cost, the difference first reduces any balance in that paid -in capital from treasury stock account.

If that's not enough, then it reduces retained earnings.

So it can hit retained earnings.

It can.

But the crucial takeaway,

no gain or loss is ever recognized on these transactions.

Dealing in your own stock is a capital transaction, not an operating one.

Got it.

Beyond buybacks,

how else do companies give value back?

Dividends.

Right.

What influences those decisions?

Dividends are the classic way.

Decisions involve legality state laws often limit dividends, usually can't pay them out of legal capital, and economic soundness.

A company needs enough cash, not just retained earnings on paper.

Right.

Retained earnings doesn't equal cash in the bank.

Exactly.

A company might have huge retained earnings, but be cash -poor if everything's tied up in equipment.

The SEC actually encourages disclosure about dividend policies.

Okay.

Let's talk types beyond just cash dividends.

Right.

All types reduce total stockholders' equity, remember.

Okay.

First, cash dividends, there's a timeline.

Declaration date, board approves, it becomes liability.

Date of record, identifies who gets paid, no entry needed.

And date of payment, cash goes out, liability cleared.

Declaration, record, payment.

Got it.

And remember, cumulative preferred dividends and arrears get paid first.

No dividends on treasury stock.

Yeah.

What else?

Property dividends.

Distributing non -cash assets, like shares of another company.

Key step.

Restate the property to fair value first.

Recognize any gain or loss.

Wait, recognize a gain before distributing.

Yes, on the declaration date.

Yeah.

Then record the dividend at that fair value.

The trendler example shows a gain recognized on investments before they're paid out as a dividend.

Interesting.

And the last type.

Liquidating dividends.

These are different.

They're a return of the shareholders' investment paid from capital accounts, not retained earnings.

So not profits, but getting your initial money back.

Essentially, yes.

And it's crucial they're clearly labeled as such to avoid misleading investors.

The Manchester Mines example, debits paid in capital.

Okay.

What about stock dividends and stock splits?

They don't give you cash, but they change the number of shares.

What's the difference?

Good distinction to make.

Neither changes total stockholders' equity or assets.

They're just reclassifications within equity.

Okay.

Internal shifts.

Right.

Stock dividends capitalize part of retained earnings.

Small ones, under 20 -25 % of shares, are recorded at fair value.

Large ones, 25 % plus, are recorded at par value.

Retained earnings goes down.

Capital stock accounts go up.

So converting retained earnings into stock.

Pretty much.

Stock splits, like a 2 -for -1 or Qualcomm's 4 -for -1, just increase the number of shares and decrease the par value proportionally.

Think of cutting a pizza into more slices.

Same pizza, more pieces.

Exactly.

And importantly, there's no journal entry for a stock split.

It's often done to lower the share price, make it more accessible.

Okay.

So after all these potential changes, how does this all get presented and what key ratios should we look at?

It all comes together in the stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet.

You'll see the components we discussed.

Many companies also provide a detailed statement of stockholders' equity showing all the changes.

Notes are important, too, for things like dividend restrictions.

And the ratios.

Three key ones.

Return on common stockholders' equity.

ROE measures profitability from the common shareholders' view.

Formula is net income preferred dividends, average common equity.

All -State had about 21 % in 2020.

Pretty good return.

Yeah.

Second, the payout ratio.

What percentage of earnings available to common shareholders is paid out as cash dividends?

All -States was around 12 .5 % in 2020, shows their dividend strategy.

Okay.

And third, book value per share.

Common equity divided by outstanding shares.

It's the theoretical liquidation value per share based on the books.

All -States was about $93 in 2020.

You compare that to the market price.

And you mentioned data analytics.

Right.

Becoming huge for tracking these ratios over time, benchmarking against peers, finding trends.

All right.

Let's dive into the next big area.

Dilutive securities.

What exactly is dilution here?

Dilution basically means your slice of the ownership pie gets smaller.

It's the reduction in existing shareholders' ownership percentage and, importantly, their earnings per share, EPS, when new common shares are issued or could be issued.

Could be issued.

Yeah.

That's key.

Things like convertible bonds,

convertible preferred stock, stock options,

warrants they represent potential future shares.

If they become shares, existing owners have a smaller piece of the company.

Okay.

So it waters down ownership and potentially profits per share.

Exactly.

Let's start with convertible debt, like convertible bonds.

Why issue these?

What's the attraction?

For the company, a big plus is often lower interest costs than straight debt.

Investors accept less interest because they get the potential upside.

If the stock price goes up, they can convert the debt to stock.

A bit of a sweetener.

Right.

And it offers capital structure flexibility.

Companies like Tesla have used them to manage their debt levels.

For the investor, it's that combo.

The safety net of a bond, principle and interest, plus the chance for equity gains if the stock does well.

Under GAAP, they're usually just accounted for as debt initially.

We touched on convertible preferred earlier, but remind us how its conversion hits the books.

Same idea as we discussed the book value method.

When converted, you debit the preferred stock accounts, credit the common stock accounts, just reclassifying equity.

Critically, no gain or loss is recognized.

It impacts shares outstanding for EPS, though.

Got it.

What about stock warrants?

How are they different from convertibles?

Warrants give the holder the option to buy stock at a set price for a certain time, often used as sweeteners with bonds like convertible.

Okay.

So what's the main difference?

Warrants require cash to exercise.

You pay the exercise price to get the shares.

With convertibles, you typically just exchange the bond or preferred stock directly for common shares, no extra cash involved usually.

The cash part is key.

How are they accounted for?

If they're detachable from the bond they're issued with, the proceeds from the sale get allocated between the bond and the warrant based on their fair values.

The Durant example shows this proportional split.

When exercised, cash comes in and stock is issued.

If they expire,

the capital associated with them just gets reclassified.

Okay.

Now moving to employees.

How do companies use stock for compensation?

It's a huge part of long -term compensation, aiming to build loyalty and give employees an equity interest, align their goals with shareholders.

Cause it's in the game.

Exactly.

Gap requires the fair value method.

Compensation costs is based on the fair value at the grant date and is expensed over the required service period, usually the vesting period.

What are the common types?

Stock options.

Right to buy stock at a set exercise price after vesting.

Restricted stock plans.

Actual stock or units transferred but subject to forfeiture until vesting.

These can be restricted stock awards, stock issued upfront but restricted, or restricted stock units, RSUs, promised to issue stock later.

The Sparks example shows expensing restricted stock over the service period.

And employee stock purchase plans, ESPPs, let employees buy stock often at a discount.

These might be compensatory depending on the terms.

Any trends here?

Definitely a shift away from options towards restricted stock, especially RSUs.

Seen is better for long -term alignment, maybe less focus on just short -term stock price bumps.

And RSUs are often simpler administratively.

But regardless of type, expensing this compensation is crucial for accurate financial reporting.

Okay, last big topic.

Earnings per share.

EPS.

This one gets a ton of attention.

It really does.

It's the income earned per common share.

A key profitability metric investors watch closely.

Public companies have to report it prominently on the income statement.

Let's start simple.

Basic EPS.

Okay.

Basic EPS applies if a company has a simple capital structure, only common stock or maybe preferred stock that isn't convertible.

The formula is net income preferred dividends, weighted average common shares outstanding.

Net income minus preferred dividends.

Right.

And for cumulative preferred stock, you subtract the current year's dividend, whether it was declared or not.

For non -cumulative, only if declared.

Okay.

That's an important distinction.

Very.

And the denominator, weighted average shares, accounts for shares issued or bought back during the year.

Shares are weighted by the fraction of the year they were outstanding.

Frank Sink is a good example.

Also, stock dividend splits are treated retroactively, like they happened at the start of the earliest year shown, for comparability.

Makes sense for comparison.

Now the trickier one, diluted EPS.

Right.

This applies to companies with a complex capital structure, those with convertible securities, options, warrants, things that could dilute EPS.

These companies must show both basic and diluted EPS.

A dual presentation.

Exactly.

Diluted EPS is a what -if calculation.

What would EPS be if all those potentially dilutive securities were converted or exercised?

How is that calculated?

Depends on the security.

For convertible securities, bonds, preferred, you use the if -converted method.

Assume conversion at the beginning of the year.

Numerator.

Add back the interest, net of tax, or preferred dividends you wouldn't have paid.

Denominator.

Add the shares that would be issued.

Mayfield, bonds, and Curry, preferred examples, illustrate this.

Okay.

Adjust income and shares.

What about options and warrants?

For those, use the treasury stock method.

Assume exercise at the beginning of the year.

Figure out the cash proceeds the company would receive.

Assume the company uses that cash to buy back its own shares at the average market price for the year.

Buy back shares.

Yeah.

That's the assumption.

The net increase in shares issued minus shares, theoretically repurchased, gets added to the denominator.

The numerator isn't affected here.

The McIlroy example shows this calculation.

Okay.

That's different.

Treasury stock method.

Anything else?

One really important concept.

Anti -dilution.

Anti.

Meaning, if assuming conversion or exercise would actually increase EPS or decrease a loss per share, you don't include that security in the diluted EPS calculation.

The goal is to show the maximum potential dilution, the worst -case scenario.

For options, if the exercise price is above the market price, they're anti -dilutive.

We include things that make EPS lower.

Exactly.

Diluted EPS should always be equal to or less than basic EPS.

So, wrapping up, why does EPS matter so much?

And any final warnings for our listeners?

It matters because it's a widely used, easily comparable measure of profitability per share.

It feeds into the P -E ratio, influences stock prices.

But the warning, EPS can be managed or influenced by things other than core operational growth.

Like the buybacks we talked about.

Precisely.

Apple's huge EPS growth, for example, was significantly helped by massive share buybacks reducing the share count.

That's not necessarily bad, but you need to understand why EPS is changing.

Don't just look at the headline number.

Dig deep into the quality of earnings and the drivers of EPS growth.

So, looking at all this equity structure, dilutions, EPS.

What's the big takeaway for our listener?

I think the takeaway is that understanding stockholders' equity and these potentially dilutive securities gives you a much more powerful lens.

You can analyze a company's financial decisions, its strategy, its commitment to shareholders.

It goes way beyond just the surface profit numbers.

It helps you understand the structure supporting the performance.

So, the next time you hear about a big company launching another stock buyback or maybe issuing some complex convertible preferred stock, don't just nod along.

Ask yourself, how is this actually reshaping the ownership?

What's the likely impact on EPS, both basic and diluted?

And maybe most importantly, what does this move really signal about where the company sees its future?

Good questions to ask.

Keep digging, keep applying what you've learned today, and keep exploring those stories hidden inside the financial statements.