Chapter 11: Managing Pricing and Sales Promotions

Welcome to Last Minute Lecture.

This free chapter overview is designed to help students review and understand key concepts.

These summaries supplement not replaced the original textbook and may not be redistributed or resold.

For complete coverage, always consult the official text.

Welcome to the Deep Dive.

We sift through the sources to bring you the key insights, fast.

Today we're diving into pricing.

It also gets boiled down to just a number, right?

But price is actually the only part of the marketing mix that directly brings in revenue.

Everything else costs.

Exactly.

It's way more than a number.

It's a really powerful statement about value.

Prices aren't just random.

Right.

They're signals.

They reflect company strategy.

What you, the consumer, will accept,

competitor moves.

It's intricate.

So every price tag you see is the result of this, like, complex dance between psychology and strategy?

Pretty much.

Yeah.

Okay.

Let's use an example to show how dynamic this gets.

Netflix started way back in 97 DVD rentals by mail.

Right.

I remember that.

By 2018, they had 130 million subscribers globally.

When streaming launched in 2010, it was, what, like $7 .99 a month?

Seemed cheap.

Yeah.

Very lean.

But then the whole streaming world just exploded.

Amazon, Apple, Hulu jumping in, and everyone needed original content.

That cost money.

A lot of money.

Billions.

Netflix realized unique shows were the key to keeping people subscribed.

So to fund all that content, they had to raise prices strategically,

but, you know, boldly.

And it wasn't just once.

That $7 .99 starting point led to different tiers, premium options hitting, like, $15 in 99s about 2019.

And Reed Hastings, the CEO, he was pretty clear about tying those hikes to value.

Basically saying, look at all this content you're getting now.

Which really sets up what we want to do today.

We're going to unpack the core ideas, the strategies, the psychology behind pricing and sales promotions.

The goal is for you to understand not just what price is, but why it's so powerful and how companies manage it today.

We'll connect the theory to stuff you see every day.

Okay.

Let's get into it.

We have to start with the consumer with you and how we actually perceive prices.

It's rarely just about the number itself.

No, definitely not.

Your perception is shaped by, well, everything.

Past experiences, what your friends say, ads, and now instantly checking prices online on your phone.

And it's interesting how we set these internal limits.

Totally.

There's usually a lower threshold.

If something's too cheap, you think, hmm, what's wrong with it?

Low quality.

Or maybe a scam.

Right.

And then there's an upper threshold where it just feels way too expensive, like, no way I'm paying that.

It's a fine line.

It really is.

And what's key here is how price communicates quality,

especially for what we call egosensitive products.

Ah.

Okay.

Like perfumes, fancy cars, designer clothes.

Exactly.

Why does an Armani t -shirt cost, say, $275 when a Gap one is maybe $15?

It's not just the cotton.

It's the brand.

The image.

Exclusivity.

Think about Ferrari.

They deliberately make fewer cars than people want under $7 ,000 a year, even with demand growing.

So scarcity drives up the price and the desire.

Precisely.

It signals uniqueness.

This sort of unattainable status that makes people want it even more.

So beyond the price itself, we compare it.

Always.

We use reference prices.

When you see a price, you're almost automatically comparing it to something.

Might be internal, what you remember paying, or what you just feel is a fair price.

Or it could be external, right?

Like seeing the regular price next to the sale price.

Yep.

Or what a competitor charges.

Marketers get really clever with this.

How so?

Well, a department store might put its own mid -range brand right next to super expensive designer stuff.

Suddenly, the mid -range looks like a bargain.

Oh, clever.

Or they flash a high manufacturer's suggested retail price, the MSRP, to make their current price seem like a steal.

And the internet's changed all this, hasn't it?

Instant comparisons.

Completely.

Puts massive pressure on retailers to be competitive.

Or at least justify their price.

It's not just the comparison point, but how the price looks.

You mentioned pricing cues.

Yeah, this is fascinating stuff.

The classic one is ending prices in $900.

Like $290 instead of $300.

We all see that.

Why does it work?

Or does it work?

The belief is strong.

It makes the item seem like it's in a lower price category because we read left to right.

Two something versus three something.

It also kind of whispers bargain.

Which is why luxury brands usually avoid it.

They want to signal premium, not discount.

Exactly.

There's even a study they took a dress, priced it at $34.

Then they tried pricing the exact same dress at $39.

Demand increased at $39.

But when they went from $34 to $34, demand dropped.

That nine ending somehow suggested it was marked down, even though the price went up slightly.

Wow.

Okay.

What about prices ending in zero five?

Those are common too.

Often just because they're easier for us to process and remember.

Simple.

And sale signs.

Classed a cue.

Definitely spurs demand.

But overuse kills it.

If everything's always on sale, the sign means nothing.

These cues work best when you, the consumer, don't really know the typical price range or maybe you buy it infrequently.

That feeling of limited availability sale ends Friday.

It's another big one.

Creates urgency.

FOMO.

Fear of missing out.

Got it.

So given all these psychological games, how do companies actually land on a price?

Is there a process?

Oh yeah.

It's usually pretty structured.

Typically involves about six key steps.

And it starts before the steps really with deciding where to position the product.

On that quality price spectrum you mentioned.

Exactly.

I think Marriott hotels.

They don't just have Marriott.

They have JW Marriott at the high end, then Marriott, then Courtyard, then Fairfield Inn.

Different price points.

Different quality signals.

Okay.

So step one of the formal process.

Defining the pricing objective.

What are they actually trying to achieve with this price?

Is it current profit maximization?

Squeezing out the most profit right now?

Sounds good, but risky maybe?

Can be.

Hard to estimate demand and cost perfectly, and you might sacrifice long run growth for short term gain.

What else?

Or maybe it's market penetration.

Setting a really low price to grab as much market share as possible, fast.

When would that make sense?

Works best if the market is really price sensitive, and if your costs go down significantly as you produce more.

That's the experience curve effect.

Texas Instruments did this brilliantly in the early calculator days.

Ah, okay.

Build huge factories,

price low, dominate.

Right.

And that low price also discourages competitors from jumping in.

What's the opposite of penetration?

That would be market skimming.

You launch a new technology, maybe at a high initial price.

You skim the cream, get the customers willing to pay top dollar first.

Sony used to do this a lot with new gadgets, right?

Classic example.

Price starts high, then gradually drops over time.

This works when you have strong initial demand, not much immediate competition, and the high price reinforces a superior image.

Any other objectives?

Sure.

Quality leadership.

You charge a premium price specifically to fund high levels of R &D, production quality, service.

Think Starbucks, BMW, maybe Grey Goose vodka, carving out that super premium niche.

Makes sense.

They invest in the quality, and the price reflects that.

And even nonprofits have objectives.

A university might aim to cover part of its costs through tuition, while a hospital probably needs full cost recovery.

Pricing depends on the mission.

Okay.

Objective set.

What's step two?

Determining demand.

This is fundamental.

How many units will people actually buy at different price points?

Generally, the higher the price, the lower the demand, and vice versa.

The classic demand curve.

Right.

And this brings in price elasticity.

How much does demand actually change when the price changes?

If you raise the price and demand barely drops, it's inelastic.

Like gasoline, maybe?

Yeah.

Or essential medicines?

Good examples.

You still need them.

But if you raise the price and demand plummets, it's elastic.

Lots of substitutes available, perhaps.

Like choosing between different brands of soda or smartphones.

Exactly.

Research suggests the average price elasticity is around negative 2 .6, meaning a 1 % price drop leads to about a 2 .6 % increase in sales on average.

But it varies hugely by product and situation.

Okay.

Step three must be costs, right?

Estimating costs.

Demand sets the ceiling for your price, but costs set the floor.

You need to cover your fixed costs, rent, salaries, stuff that doesn't change with output.

And your variable costs, materials, components that do change with how much you make.

Right.

And you look at the average cost per unit.

This usually changes depending on how much you're producing.

How so?

Well, think about Samsung making tablets.

If they only make a few, the cost per tablet is really high because those fixed costs are spread over fewer units.

As production ramps up, the average cost drops.

Until?

Until you maybe go past your optimal capacity.

Then things can get inefficient again and average costs might start creeping back up.

And this ties into that experience curve thing.

It does.

The experience curve shows how the average cost tends to fall as the company gains more experience producing something.

Just the act of making more units teaches you how to do it cheaper, faster, better.

So Samsung's cost per tablet might drop from say $100 to $80 just because they've doubled their total production volume over time.

Exactly.

But relying only on experience curve pricing is risky.

Why?

You could end up with a cheap brand image.

You assume your competitors are weak and won't catch up.

And crucially, if a competitor comes out with a totally new, better technology, you'd be stuck with an outdated, low -cost process for a product nobody wants anymore.

So use it for efficiency, but keep innovating.

Always.

Step four is analyzing competitors' prices.

You absolutely cannot price in a bubble.

You have to see what the other guys are doing.

You need to know their costs, their prices, their likely reactions.

If your product offers, say, $10 more value than a competitor's, maybe you can price $10 higher.

If theirs has features yours lacks, you might need to price lower.

And we've seen companies totally shake things up here, right?

The value players.

Huge impact.

Think Aldi, Lidl and Groceries, JetBlue, Southwest, and Airlines.

They manage to offer low prices and surprisingly decent quality.

Which messes with customer expectations for the traditional players.

Big time.

It forces the established companies to think about launching their own low -cost alternatives just to compete.

Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

Okay, step five.

We've looked at objectives, demand, costs, competitors.

Now what?

Now you actually select a pricing method.

Remember, costs are the floor, competitor prices are a reference point, and customer value is the ceiling.

Several ways to approach this.

What's the simplest?

Probably markup pricing.

Just add a standard percentage markup to the product's cost.

Super common in retail.

Like this toaster costs us $16 to make.

We want a 20 % margin on the selling price, so we divide $16 by 1 minus .2.

That's $20.

Exactly.

It's simple, predictable, especially if your costs are stable.

But the big downside, it completely ignores demand and what customers actually value.

Seems like a big oversight.

It can be.

Another method is economic value to customer, EDC pricing.

This is way more sophisticated.

How does that work?

You price based on the total perceived value delivered to the customer.

Not just the product itself, but performance, reliability, support, brand reputation, the whole package.

So you're selling the overall benefit, not just the thing itself.

Precisely.

Caterpillar is a classic example.

They might charge a $10 ,000 premium for a tractor compared to a competitor.

But they demonstrate to the buyer that over the tractor's lifetime, that premium delivers maybe $20 ,000 in extra value through better durability, less downtime, better service, higher resale value.

So the higher upfront price actually means lower total cost of ownership.

That's the argument.

Beccar does this with their Kenworth and Peterbilt trucks too.

They command about a 10 % premium because they focus on quality, efficiency, driver comfort, which all adds up to better long -term value for the trucking company.

But you have to convince the customer of that value.

Absolutely.

Communication is key.

You have to show them the math, the proof.

It's not just about having the value, it's about making it visible.

What about just matching the competition?

That's basically competitive pricing or going rate pricing.

You base your price largely on what competitors are charging.

Very common in industries where products are similar, like steel or paper.

Smaller firms often just follow the leader.

Seems passive almost.

It can be.

It sort of assumes the collective wisdom of the industry knows the right price.

And then there's auction pricing.

Which is huge online now.

Massive.

You've got English auctions ascending bids, like eBay, highest bidder wins, Dutch auctions descending bids.

Price starts high and drops until someone bites.

Or the reverse.

One buyer, many sellers bidding the price down.

Common in B2B procurement.

Like companies getting bids for supplies.

Exactly.

And sealed bid auctions, where everyone submits one secret bid.

Governments use this a lot for contracts.

Okay, that brings us to the final step, number six.

Setting the final price.

After all that analysis, you land on the actual price.

But companies rarely have just one price.

They develop a whole pricing structure.

To account for different situations.

Different customer segments, different purchase volumes, different times, different locations.

This is where dynamic pricing comes in big time.

Price is changing constantly.

Sometimes hourly, even minute by minute online.

Based on inventory, how fast things are selling, what competitors just did.

Think airline tickets, sports game tickets.

Amazon marketplace sellers changing prices all the time.

Yep.

And this leads directly into price discrimination.

Some the same basic product at different prices.

Where the difference isn't just based on cost.

How does that show up?

Lots of ways.

Customer segment pricing.

Museums giving discounts to students or seniors.

Some studies even showed travel sites showing higher hotel prices to people browsing from Apple devices.

Wow.

Really?

Yeah.

Based on data suggesting they might pay more.

Then there's product form pricing.

Avian water in a bottle versus basically the same water in a fancy facial mist spray bottle at a much higher price per ounce.

Ah, the packaging makes it different.

Or location pricing.

Better seats at the theater cost more.

Time pricing.

Early bird specials.

Weekend hotel rates being different.

Those Valentine's Day roses costing a fortune right before February 14th.

And airlines with their yield management.

The ultimate example.

Sophisticated systems balancing cheap early fares with expensive last minute ones to maximize revenue per flight.

The person next to you might have paid five times what you did.

Is all this legal?

Charging different people different prices?

Generally, yes.

If it's not based on illegal discrimination, like race or religion, and doesn't harm competition in specific ways, like predatory pricing aimed at driving rivals out of business,

there are conditions for it to work well.

You need to be able to segment the market, prevent resale between segments, and ensure customers don't get too resentful.

Okay, switching gears slightly.

What about pricing within a company's whole range of products?

That's product mix pricing.

You're trying to maximize profit across the entire portfolio, not just on one item.

Like supermarkets using loss leader pricing.

Exactly.

They'll dramatically cut the price on, say, coke or milk, maybe even sell below cost just to get you in the door.

Hoping you'll buy lots of other higher margin stuff while you're there.

That's the idea.

Though manufacturers sometimes hate it if it makes their brand look cheap.

What else is in the mix?

Captive product pricing.

Low price on the main product.

High price on the necessary extras.

The classic razor and blades model.

Yep.

Or printers and ink cartridges.

Movie theaters practically give away the ticket,

but make a killing on popcorn and soda.

Free cell phone, but you're locked into an expensive two -year contract.

Right.

And bundling.

Product bundling.

Selling multiple products together as a package.

Sometimes it's pure bundling, you can only buy the bundle.

More often it's mixed bundling, you can buy items individually or in the bundle, and the bundle is usually cheaper.

Like a season ticket for sports or theater.

Perfect example.

Though sometimes customers book back, wanting to unbundle and just buy the parts they want for less.

Offering both options is often smartest.

Okay, so prices are set,

but they don't stay static, right?

Companies have to initiate changes.

Let's talk price cuts.

Right.

A company might cut prices if they have excess capacity they need to fill, or if they're making a strategic push to dominate the market through lower costs.

But there are downsides.

Big ones.

Customers might start expecting lower prices all the time.

They might perceive your quality as lower, their loyalty might evaporate if someone else cuts prices later, and you risk igniting a price war.

Which nobody usually wins.

Pretty much.

Customers also get suspicious.

Why do they cut the price?

Is a new model coming out?

Is the product faulty?

Are they in financial trouble?

Will the price drop even further later?

Lots of potential negative interpretations.

What about raising prices?

Price increases can have a huge positive impact on profits.

Remember that stat.

A 1 % price increase can boost profits by a third for a company with thin margins.

Wow.

So why do it?

Usually driven by rising costs, cost inflation.

Or sometimes demand is just so high they can raise prices without losing sales.

But customers hate price increases.

Generally, yes.

You risk looking like a price gouger.

Think about Coca -Cola trying out vending machines that charge more in hot weather.

Huge backlash.

Amazon's dynamic pricing sometimes gets criticism too.

So how do you do it smartly?

Communication is key.

Give advance notice if possible.

Explain why prices are going up.

Or make less visible changes.

Like reducing discount sizes, increasing minimum order quantity, small tweaks rather than a big jump in the sticker price.

Makes sense.

Now what about reacting when a competitor changes their price?

This is critical.

You have to anticipate reactions.

You need to understand why your competitor cut their price.

Are they desperate?

Are they trying to grab market share?

Is it temporary or permanent?

How does that affect your response?

You have to consider the impact on your sales and profits if you do nothing.

And think about how they might react to your reaction.

It gets tactical.

Market leaders especially face this when smaller aggressive players cut prices.

Think T -Mobile shaking up the mobile market against AT &T and Verizon.

So what can the leader do?

Options include.

Emphasize your differentiation even more to justify your price.

Launch your own lower -cost brand or fighter brand.

Or in extreme cases, try to reinvent yourself as a lower -cost player too.

Preparation is key.

Have contingency plans ready.

Okay, let's shift to managing incentives sales promotions.

Right.

These are short -term tactics to get people to buy sooner or buy more.

Things like coupons, rebates, contests.

And digital coupons are huge now.

Exploding.

Cheaper for the company.

No printing costs.

Easier to track, easier to customize.

And redemption rates are often much higher than paper coupons.

But do these promotions actually build long -term business?

That's the big question.

They definitely boost sales in the short run.

But often, there's little permanent gain.

Customers might just buy now instead of later, stockpiling.

Leading to a sales dip after the promotion ends.

And constant discounting.

Can really devalue the brand.

If something's always on sale, people start thinking the sale price is the real price.

And the original list price seems fake.

It can destroy perceived value.

Are some promotions better than others at building the brand?

Yes.

Some are considered consumer franchise building.

Think loyalty programs or coupons that also highlight a new product feature.

They deliver value and reinforce the brand message.

And others.

Others are generally not brand building.

Simple price -off packs.

Contests unrelated to the product.

Most trade allowances.

They just move volume short -term, potentially at the expense of brand equity.

So companies need to look past the list price.

Absolutely.

They need to do a net price analysis.

What's the real price they get after factoring in all the discounts, the money spent on promotions, allowances given to retailers?

That $3 ,000 list price might actually only yield $2 ,100 in real revenue.

So when deciding on incentives, what are the key decisions?

First, objectives.

What are you trying to achieve?

Encourage trial by non -users.

Get current users to buy more.

Get retailers to stock your product.

Then, the details.

How big should the incentive be?

Who's eligible?

How long does it last?

How do you deliver it online?

Impact mail?

What's the budget?

And then there's push versus pull.

Crucial distinction.

A push strategy uses the sales force and trade promotions to incentivize intermediaries, wholesalers, retailers, to carry the product and promote it to end consumers.

You're pushing it through the channel.

When does that work best?

Good for products with low brand loyalty, where the purchase decision is made in the store.

Maybe impulse items.

A pull strategy uses advertising, consumer promotion, social media to build desire among consumers so they go ask for the product from retailers.

You're creating demand that pulls the product through the channel.

Better for strong brands.

Typically, yes.

High brand loyalty, high consumer involvement when people choose the brand before they shop.

The best companies, Apple, Coke, Nike, are masters at blending both push and pull.

Makes sense.

You need consumers asking for it and retailers willing to stock and display it.

Exactly.

Push is often more effective when supported by strong pull.

Okay, before we wrap, there's an important ethical dimension we need to touch on highlighted in the source material.

Prescription drug pricing.

Yes.

This is a really significant issue.

It directly connects pricing decisions to social welfare, sometimes in stark ways.

It's a tough one.

The source has mentioned some pretty extreme examples.

EpiPen.

Right.

The price for a two -pack went from around $100 in 2009 to over $600 by 2016.

Mylan, the company, reportedly had a 55 % profit margin on it.

Huge public outcry.

And that other one, Daraprim.

Turing Pharmaceuticals.

They acquired the rights to Daraprim, a drug used by AIDS and cancer patients, and hiked the price overnight by 5 ,000%.

From $13 .50 a tablet to $750.

5 ,000%.

Yeah.

The backlash was intense.

The CEO eventually resigned.

But these cases raise fundamental ethical questions.

How about the impact on people's lives?

Absolutely.

When critical medicines become unaffordable, patients, especially those who are disadvantaged, might have to skip doses or just abandon treatment entirely.

It forces a debate about profit versus moral responsibility in health care.

And transparency is a big part of this, too, isn't it?

It's hard to know how the prices are set.

Very much so.

The source has mentioned an American Marketing Association campaign called Truth Enarchs, trying to bring more transparency to the whole system, looking at drug companies, pharmacy benefit managers,

insurers.

It reflects a broader trend.

Consumers demanding more fairness and clarity, especially for essential goods.

So wrapping this all up, we've covered a huge amount of ground.

We really have.

From the psychology of how you perceive a price tag.

To the detailed steps companies take to set prices, considering objectives, demand, costs, competitors.

How they adjust prices, use incentives, deal with ethical dilemmas.

It's clear that price isn't just a simple number.

It's deeply strategic, packed with meaning, a core part of how a company communicates its value.

It really touches everything.

Understanding the customer, the market, the competition, and your own costs and goals.

It's complex.

So here's a final thought to leave you with.

As technology makes dynamic personalized pricing easier and more common,

what does a fair price even mean anymore?

Good question.

And how will our whole perception of value keep changing in this increasingly transparent global marketplace?

Definitely something to chew on.

Indeed.

Thanks for diving deep with us today.