Chapter 6: Ethical and Legal Issues

Welcome to Last Minute Lecture.

This free chapter overview is designed to help students review and understand key concepts.

These summaries supplement not replaced the original textbook and may not be redistributed or resold.

For complete coverage, always consult the official text.

Welcome to the Deep Dive.

Today we're tackling a really, really crucial area for anyone in nursing the whole landscape of ethics and legal issues.

That's right, and we're using chapter on ethical and legal issues from the Saunders Comprehensive Review for the NCLE -XPN Examination Seventh Edition as our main source.

Our mission here is, well, it's more than just summarizing.

We want to pull out the absolute must -know information, the core insights from this chapter.

Yeah, to help you get a quick but really thorough grasp of these concepts, things you absolutely need for safe and ethical nerving practice.

Exactly.

We'll be covering quite a bit, ethical principles, the laws regulating nursing, potential liabilities,

client rights, informed consent, H .E .A.

Confidentiality, legal safeguards, advanced directives, reporting duties, the whole nine yards.

It can definitely feel a bit overwhelming all these rules and principles, but stick with us.

We're aiming to make it clear and hopefully give you a really actionable understanding.

Okay, so let's start right at the foundation,

ethics.

Right.

What is ethics, fundamentally?

The source defines it as a philosophy, one concerned with right and wrong.

And importantly, it's based on knowledge, not just, you know, gut feelings or opinions.

That's a key difference from morals, right?

Morals tend to stem more from customs, traditions, maybe personal or religious beliefs.

Yeah, exactly.

Ethics provides more of a systematic way to think through things in a professional setting.

And underpinning ethics are these core ethical principles.

These are like the codes that guide our actions as nurses.

The source lists several key ones in Box 6 -1.

First up is autonomy.

Autonomy, respecting the client's right to make their own decisions about their health.

It's fundamental, their body, their choices.

Then we have non -maleficence, which is the duty to do no harm.

Always consider potential negative outcomes.

And the flip side, beneficence, the obligation to actively do good, to promote the client's well -being.

But the source throws in a caution here about beneficence leading to paternalism.

That's an interesting point.

It is.

Paternalism is when we, as health care providers, decide we know best and override the client's wishes, even if we think we're doing it for their own good.

Right.

It undermines that autonomy we just talked about.

Right.

It's a fine line between guiding and, well, dictating.

Definitely.

Empowerment is key.

Okay, next principle, justice.

Justice is all about fairness,

fair distribution of resources,

equitable treatment for everyone, no matter who they are.

Then veracity, simple but critical.

Just means telling the truth,

being honest with clients.

Trust is built on this.

Couldn't agree more.

And finally, fidelity.

Fidelity is about loyalty, keeping our promises, maintaining confidentiality, following through on care plans.

It's about being faithful to our commitments to the client.

So those are the big principles, but our personal values obviously play a role in how we apply them.

Absolutely.

Values are those deep -seated beliefs that influence our behavior.

And the source talks about values clarification, that process of really examining your own values to understand yourself better.

Which is so important for providing unbiased care, right?

Knowing where your own lines are.

Crucial.

Without that self -awareness, our own beliefs could unintentionally color how we advocate for a client or respect their choices.

Okay, moving on to ethical codes in nursing.

These are the professional codes, like the ones from the ICN and the ANA, that lay out broad principles for how we should practice and how care can be evaluated.

Now, the source makes an interesting point.

These codes aren't technically laws.

Right, they're not legally binding in the same way a statute is.

But,

violating them can absolutely lead to disciplinary action by the Board of Nursing for unprofessional conduct.

They carry serious weight.

So, they're essential guides for professional behavior.

The source points us to the International Council of Nurses Code and the American Nurses Association Code of Ethics, both really valuable resources online.

Definitely worth checking out.

But even with principles and codes, we run into ethical dilemmas.

Ah, yes.

Situations where you're stuck between two or more ethical principles and there's just no easy, perfect answer.

Whatever you do feels like it compromises something.

These are tough.

They can come from conflicting beliefs,

complex medical facts, resource limitations,

all sorts of things.

And that's where ethical reasoning comes in.

This is the systematic process the source describes for working through these dilemmas.

Yeah, it involves gathering all the info, examining the values involved, yours and others, clearly stating the problem,

brainstorming actions, negotiating if possible, and then evaluating the outcome.

It's a structured way to think it through.

And often in these tricky spots, the nurse needs to be a strong client advocate.

An advocate speaks for the client, protects their rights,

really upholds that principle of fidelity we mentioned.

And the key, as the source stresses, is representing the client's viewpoint, even if you personally disagree.

You have to set your own values aside.

That can be challenging, but it's vital.

Now, sometimes these dilemmas are too complex for one or two people to solve.

That's where ethics committees come in.

Right, those interdisciplinary groups and hospitals.

They provide a forum to discuss these really tough cases,

offer guidance, and help develop institutional policies to hopefully prevent or better manage future ethical conflicts.

The bottom line here, emphasized in the source, is that acting as a client advocate and protecting their rights is a fundamental nursing responsibility.

Okay, let's shift gears now to the legal side, the regulation of nursing practice.

And the absolute cornerstone here is the Nurse Practice Act.

Every single state has one.

It's the law, the statute, enacted by the state legislature that defines and regulates nursing practice within that state.

Its main goal is protecting the public.

So what does it cover specifically?

It sets the educational requirements to become a nurse,

distinguishes nursing practice from medical practice, crucially defining the scope of nursing practice, what you're legally allowed to And it also deals with licensure disciplinary actions and the rights of nurses if they face disciplinary charges.

And the source is very clear.

You, as a nurse, are responsible for knowing the Nurse Practice Act in the state where you work, period.

No excuses for not knowing the rules of the road, basically.

Alongside the Act, we have standards of care.

These are the guidelines that define what level of care is expected from a competent nurse in a given situation.

They're the benchmark.

And failing to meet these standards that can lead directly to legal trouble.

Specifically, findings of negligence or malpractice.

If you don't follow the Nurse Practice Act or your facility's policies, liability is pretty much a given if harm occurs.

That brings us to employee guidelines within institutions.

Let's start with respondent superior.

Sounds fancy, but it just means let the master answer.

Legally, it means the employer can be held responsible for the negligent acts of an employee, provided those acts happened while the employee was doing their job.

So the hospital or clinic can be liable, too.

What about contracts?

Nurses have contracts with employers outlining duties and rights.

Employee handbooks and policies often form part of this agreement, creating obligations you need to follow.

And those institutional policies are really important day to day, aren't they?

Definitely.

They detail how to perform duties, specific procedures, expected behaviors.

They go into more detail than the Nurse Practice Act.

Violating policy looks bad in court, so following them is a key way to minimize your liability.

Makes sense.

Now, a really practical issue.

Hospital staffing.

Understaffing is a huge challenge.

The source flags that just walking out because you feel staffing is unsafe could lead to charges of client abandonment.

What's the right way to handle concerns about unsafe staffing?

Your responsibility is to report it up the chain, tell your nursing administration, document your concerns.

You need to make sure management is aware of the situation and the potential risks to patients.

Another common staffing issue is floating.

Being reassigned to a different unit?

Yeah.

The source says this is generally a legal and acceptable practice for managing staffing needs.

Can you refuse to float?

Usually not.

Unless your contract guarantees a specific unit or if you can genuinely demonstrate you lack the basic competence to provide safe care there.

But you can't just say, I don't want to.

So if you do get floated, what are your responsibilities?

Crucially, don't take on tasks you aren't qualified for.

You must tell the supervisor on the new unit about your lack of experience with that specific patient population or procedures.

And what should you ask for?

Ask for orientation to the unit, its routines and standards.

Request a resource nurse, someone experienced on that unit who can guide you.

Typically, they should assign you patients whose needs match your existing skills.

Good advice.

Finally, under regulation, let's touch on disciplinary action against a nurse's license.

Boards of nursing have the authority to restrict, suspend, or even revoke your license.

And the reasons can be broad, right?

The source lists quite a few.

Yeah.

Things like unprofessional conduct,

actions harming public welfare,

breaking confidentiality, lacking necessary skills or judgment, any kind of patient abuse, taking tasks you aren't prepared for, improper delegation, poor record keeping, falsifying records, or abandoning your assignment.

It's a serious list.

Absolutely.

It really highlights the need for constant professionalism and competence.

Okay, let's transition into legal liability itself.

As nurses, we operate under both civil and criminal law.

We have a legal duty to provide care that meets the standard expected of a reasonably competent nurse.

The reasonable nurse standard.

Exactly.

And if you fail to meet that standard through either doing something wrong or failing to do something right, and a client is harmed as a result, you can be held legally liable.

Our source references Box 6 -2, which breaks down different types of law contract, civil, criminal, and tort law.

Tort law is particularly relevant here.

It deals with civil wrongs that cause harm outside of contract breaches.

And within tort law, we find negligence and malpractice.

Define negligence for us again.

Negligence is basically falling below the expected standard of care.

It can be an act of commission doing something a reasonable nurse wouldn't, or omission failing to do something a reasonable nurse would.

And malpractice is simply negligence committed by a professional, like a nurse, while acting in their professional capacity.

Right.

And for malpractice to be proven legally, usually four things need to be established.

Okay, what are they?

One,

duty owed to the nurse to have a professional duty to care for that client.

Two, breach of duty.

Did the nurse fail to meet the standard of care?

Three,

proximate cause.

Did that failure directly cause the client's injury?

And four,

damage injury.

Did the client actually suffer harm that can be compensated?

You generally need all four.

Typically, yes.

All four elements need to be proven for a successful malpractice claim.

It really drives home why meeting those standards of care is so critical.

Given these risks, what about professional liability insurance?

The force strongly recommends nurses get their own policy.

Don't just rely on your employer's insurance.

Why is that?

Your own policy gives you independent protection.

It means you get your own lawyer whose only job is to defend your interests, not the hospitals or clinics.

That can be crucial if interests diverge.

Makes sense.

What about helping someone in an emergency outside of work, like stopping at an accident scene?

That's where good scenario laws come in.

Most states have them.

They're designed to encourage health care professionals to help in emergencies by offering some legal protection.

Some protection, not total immunity.

Right.

Generally, they limit liability if you provide reasonable care, aren't compensated, and don't act with gross negligence or intentional harm.

But, and this is key, the specifics vary a lot by state.

You only get the protection if you meet all the conditions of your state's law.

Okay, another area needing careful attention,

controlled substances.

Absolutely.

You have to follow facility policies and procedures to the letter, which are based on federal and state laws.

Secure storage, limited access, meticulous sign -out procedures, accurate counts, that's all strictly regulated.

Let's briefly touch on collective bargaining.

This is the formal negotiation process between management and a union representing employees, like nurses, about wages, working conditions, etc.

And if talks break down?

Strikes or other work actions can happen.

The source notes, this can create a real moral dilemma for nurses, given the nature of their work caring for patients.

Okay, now let's focus on specific legal risk areas, things nurses really need to be aware of to avoid problems.

First up,

assault.

Legally, assault is putting someone in fear of imminent harmful or offensive contact.

The person has to reasonably believe they're about to be touched harmfully.

No actual touching needs to occur.

And that's different from battery.

Yes.

Battery is the actual intentional, unconsented touching.

Any non -consensual physical contact can be battery, even if it doesn't cause physical injury.

Invasion of privacy is another big one.

This covers violating confidentiality, intruding on someone's private affairs or space without cause, or sharing their health information inappropriately.

Box 610 in the source gives some examples.

What about false imprisonment?

This is restraining or confining someone against their will without legal justification.

Using restraints without a proper clinical need, or preventing a competent client from leaving the hospital, those are examples.

But competent clients can leave, right?

Even if it's against medical advice.

Absolutely.

They can sign an AMA form.

Your job, then, is to clearly document their decision, that they understood the risks and the circumstances of their departure.

That documentation protects you against false imprisonment claims.

Then there's defamation.

Making false statements that harm someone's reputation.

If it's written, it's liable.

If it's spoken, it's slander.

And fraud.

That's deliberate deception for unlawful gain.

Things like falsifying records for payment or performing unnecessary procedures.

The source does mention some exceptions, particularly with clients who have altered mental status and are an immediate danger.

Right.

In very specific acute situations, actions like using restraints might be necessary to protect the client or others.

But you always start with the least restrictive approach and only escalate after careful assessment confirms a loss of control and risk of harm.

Okay, let's move on to a really positive area.

Client rights.

Hugely important.

There's usually a formal client's bill of rights, often based on the patient's bill of rights, that emphasizes the client's autonomy and their right to be involved in their healthcare decisions.

What kind of rights does this typically include?

Box 64 in the source lists some.

Things like the right to respectful care, their right to get information about their diagnosis and treatment options, the right to consent or refuse treatment, the right to have advanced directives followed, privacy, confidentiality, access to their records.

It's quite comprehensive.

And facilities have to make this visible.

Yes.

Agencies are generally required to post the client's bill of rights, where patients can easily see it.

These rights are backed up by various laws and standards, as box 65 points out.

Are there specific rights for individuals receiving mental health care?

Yes, definitely.

Laws and standards recognize their unique vulnerabilities.

Box 66 provides a detailed list covering things like dignity, communication, managing personal affairs, religious freedom, treatment in the least restrictive setting, freedom from unnecessary restraint, confidentiality, informed consent, the right to refuse treatment.

It's extensive.

Another aspect of rights involves organ donation and transplantation.

Clients have the right to decide if they want to be an organ donor.

They also have the right to refuse a transplant as a treatment option.

How is donor status usually indicated?

Adults over 18 can often indicate it on their driver's license or in an advanced directive.

Laws like the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act specify who can consent after death, and UNOS, the United Network for Organ Sharing, handles allocation criteria.

What about the donation process itself?

Well, requirements vary depending on the organ or tissue.

Some donations require brain death criteria to be met, others can occur after circulatory death.

Donors need to be free of infection and widespread cancer.

Who usually talks to the family about donation?

Typically the physician or a specially trained nurse coordinator.

And the source makes clear, donation doesn't delay funerals, doesn't usually leave visible marks, and doesn't cost the donor's family anything.

And religious beliefs can play a big role here too, right?

Absolutely.

The source points back to Chapter 5 for how religious views impact end -of -life decisions, including organ donation.

Okay, let's dive into informed consent.

This is a huge legal and ethical concept.

It really is.

At its core, it's the client's voluntary agreement to a specific procedure or treatment after they've been given adequate information to make a decision.

And it's usually documented.

Yes, on legal consent forms.

Box 6 -7 lists different types.

Admission agreements, immunization consent, surgical consent, research consent, consent for blood transfusions, special consents for things like photos or restraints.

It shows the client is participating in their care decisions.

What information must be provided for consent to be truly informed?

The provider performing the procedure has to explain, in understandable terms, the procedure itself, the risks and benefits, potential complications, alternatives, and the consequences of not having the procedure.

And the client has to have a chance to ask questions.

Absolutely.

All questions must be answered before they sign.

And the signing must be voluntary, no pressure or threats.

An adult usually needs to witness the signature.

What's the nurse's role in witnessing?

Often, the nurse is witnessing that the signature is the client's.

Not necessarily guaranteeing the client fully understands everything the provider explained.

The provider is responsible for the informing part.

Who can give consent?

The client has to be competent, right?

Yes.

Mentally and emotionally competent.

Someone heavily sedated, unconscious,

significantly impaired by drugs or alcohol, or with advanced dementia, might not be competent.

Box 6 -8 gives examples.

Generally competent adult over 18 sign for themselves.

Are there exceptions where consent isn't needed beforehand?

Emergencies are the main one.

If delaying treatment to get consent would cause serious harm or death, treatment can often proceed under implied consent, following policy.

Also, clients can refuse information or waive consent, but that needs careful documentation.

And they can always withdraw consent later.

Again, who's ultimately responsible for the informing part?

The primary health care provider doing the procedure.

That's their job.

What about minors?

People under 18?

Generally, minors can't give legal consent.

A parent or legal guardian has to consent for them.

But there are exceptions.

Yes.

Emergencies, again.

Also, depending on state law, minors can sometimes consent for specific sensitive services,

like substance abuse treatment, SEI testing treatment, contraception, pregnancy care, or some mental health services.

Also, emancipated minors, or those with court orders, can consent.

The Guttmacher Institute website is a good resource for state specifics.

And what makes a minor emancipated?

They've legally established independence, maybe through marriage, military service, having a child, or getting a court order.

Emancipated minors can sign their own consents.

Okay, let's tackle HIPAA, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

IP, that big federal law, primarily focused on protecting the privacy and security of protected health information, or PHI.

And PHI is?

Any identifiable information about someone's health status, the health care they receive, or payment for that care, past, present, or future.

So HIPAA requires agencies to keep this private.

Yes, and they also have to tell clients about their privacy rights, how their information might be used, and what the agency's responsibilities are.

What rights do clients have regarding their PHI under IPA?

Quite a few.

They have the right to see and get copies of their health info, request corrections if something's wrong, get a list of who their info has been disclosed to, with some exceptions, request limits on how their info is used for treatment, payment, or operations, though the provider doesn't always have to agree.

Okay, keep going.

They can also ask to be contacted in specific ways or places, and get a paper copy of the agency's notice of privacy practices.

Some requests might need to be written, and there might be fees for copies.

And importantly, they can file complaints if they think their rights were violated.

How can agencies use or disclose PHI without specific authorization?

IPA allows use and disclosure for key functions.

Treatment, payment, and health care operations, things like quality improvement,

training, audits, business management.

So the basics needed to run the health care system and get paid.

Right.

Also for things like telling clients about treatment options, aggregating data, administering benefits, Box 6 .9 lists other permitted disclosures, legal proceedings, emergencies, research with safeguards, coroners, organ donation, preventing serious threats, government oversight, public health reporting, military needs, and of course, if the client gives valid written authorization.

This ties directly into confidentiality and information security.

Confidentiality is that ethical and legal duty to protect the client's PHI.

It's based on trust in the nurse -client relationship information shared won't be spread around.

Box 6 .10 shows examples of privacy violations.

What's the nurse's specific responsibility here?

We're bound by our Nurse Practice Act, ethical codes, standards, and facility policies.

Breaching confidentiality can lead to lawsuits for invasion of privacy and disciplinary action.

We have to protect clients from indiscriminate disclosure.

Box 6 .11 gives tips on maintaining it.

Social media adds a modern layer of complexity, doesn't it?

Oh, absolutely.

It can be useful.

But misuse is a huge risk for hyperviolations and getting fired.

Nurses need to follow ethics codes, confidentiality rules, and social media policies.

The ANA has resources on this.

Professional boundaries are key online.

Never share patient info learned on the job.

And report any breaches you see.

Box 6 .12 discusses this more.

What about the medical record itself?

It's confidential, but clients have the right to read it and get copies.

Access inside the facility should be limited to those directly involved in care.

Doctors, nurses, techs, therapists, social workers, unit clerks maybe.

Others need client permission.

After discharge, records go to health information management.

And electronic records.

Same principles apply.

Access should be role -based, limited to relevant areas.

Unique usernames and strong passwords are vital.

Never share your password.

Change it regularly.

Log off workstations.

What about using client information for research?

It has to be de -identified.

Reports shouldn't identify individuals.

And access must be restricted to the research team.

Protecting confidentiality is a constant priority.

Okay, let's talk about legal safeguards.

Things that protect both nurses and clients.

Risk management is first.

Risk management is proactive.

It's about identifying potential risks, analyzing them, and developing plans to reduce accidents and injuries.

A cornerstone of this is systematic incident reporting.

Incident reports, sometimes called occurrence reports.

When are these needed?

Box 613 gives examples.

Things like accidentally missing a treatment.

Situations that caused or could have caused injury.

Falls, medication errors, needle sticks, equipment problems, visitor injuries.

Basically anything unusual or potentially harmful.

What's the purpose?

Is it punitive?

No.

The main goal isn't blame.

It's to document what happened, identify risks, find patterns, and improve care quality and safety.

How should they be documented?

Factually, objectively, completely.

Follow facility policy.

Crucially, do not put the incident report in the client's chart.

And don't even mention in the chart that a report was filed.

It's an internal risk management tool, not part of the legal medical record.

But you still document the event itself in the chart.

Absolutely.

You document the event, your assessment, interventions, the client's response, and that you notified the provider, just like any other clinical event.

And if an error or injury occurred, you need to monitor the client closely.

What about safeguarding client valuables?

Guest practice is they have family take them home.

If not possible, secure them according to policy, usually in a safe.

Document exactly what was stored and where.

Many places have clients sign a release.

Simple wedding bands might be taped on.

Religious items pinned if allowed.

Okay, provider prescriptions.

Big area for nurses.

Huge.

We have a legal duty to carry out valid prescriptions.

Unless we believe the prescription is wrong, unclear, or potentially harmful.

What if you do think it's wrong?

You cannot just carry it out.

You could be liable if harm results.

Your duty is to clarify it with the prescriber.

Get it corrected or explained.

And if you still disagree or can't get clarification.

Escalate it.

Go to your charge nurse, manager, or supervisor.

Follow the chain of command.

Never carry out an order you believe is unsafe.

What about telephone orders?

Facilities have specific policies.

Box 614 covers the basics.

Date time.

Repeat the order back.

Record it.

Sign it with T .O., telephone order, the prescriber's name, and your name title.

Often requires a second nurse witness.

The prescriber has to countersign it later per policy.

And box 615 lists all the essential parts of any medication order.

The bottom line is never guess, always clarify.

Precisely.

Now documentation.

We've touched on it, but it's a massive legal safeguard.

Legally required by multiple entities, right?

Yes.

Accrediting bodies, state laws, practice acts.

You have to follow agency guidelines.

Box 616 has a great list of do's and don'ts.

Give us the highlights.

Use black ink.

Date time everything.

Be objective and factual.

Document promptly.

Chart client responses.

Record consents, refusals.

Note calls to providers.

Use quotes for subjective data.

Use good grammar spelling.

Sign everything with your title.

Correct errors properly.

Follow late entry rules.

Use only your own computer codes.

Protect printed info.

And the don'ts.

Don't.

Document for others.

Change others' notes.

Use unapproved abbreviations.

Check joint commission standards.

Make judgmental comments.

Leave blank spaces.

Share your password.

Forget to log off.

Thorough documentation is your best defense.

What about client teaching?

Also critical.

Provide clear instructions.

Use interpreters if needed.

Follow protocols.

Document what you taught.

How you evaluated understanding, like Teach Bag and who was there.

Also, inform them of consequences if they don't follow instructions.

Okay, let's shift to advanced directives.

These relate to the Client Self -Determination Act.

It requires facilities to inform adult clients about their right to make written directions for their future care if they become unable to decide for themselves.

So what happens on admission regarding these?

You have to ask if they have an advanced directive.

If yes, document it and get a copy for the record if possible.

If they want to make one, provide info and resources.

Document if one is signed during the stay.

What are the main types?

Two main types.

First, an instructional directive, often called a living will.

This states what treatments the person wants or doesn't want if they're terminally ill or incapacitated.

And the second type.

A durable power of attorney for healthcare.

This appoints a person, a healthcare proxy or agent, to make healthcare decisions for the client if they can no longer make them.

What about do not resuscitate DNR orders?

A DNR is a specific medical order written by a provider after discussion with the client or their representative, stating CPR should not be performed if their heart or breathing stops.

Usually for clients with serious progressive illness who choose to forego resuscitation.

Does the client have to consent?

Yes.

Informed consent from the client, if competent, or their legal rep is required.

The order needs to be clear about what's being withheld.

Some places use specific protocols like DNR comfort care.

What if there's no DNR order?

Then the standard is full resuscitation efforts.

Everyone on the team needs to know the DNR status.

These orders need regular review per policy and can be changed.

State laws vary, so know your state's rules.

What's the nurse's role in all this?

Facilitate communication about values,

ensure clients know their rights to make directives, ask about existing directives on admission, get them in the chart, tell the provider,

and critically ensure the healthcare team follows the directive.

Agency policy might restrict nurses from witnessing these legal documents, but if allowed, careful documentation of the event is key.

Finally, let's cover reporting responsibilities.

What things are nurses legally required to report?

Mandatory reporting laws require nurses to report certain things to authorities.

This includes suspected child or elder abuse, domestic violence, specific communicable diseases, and certain injuries like gunshot or stab wounds, animal bites, assaults, etc.

What about concerns about an impaired co -worker, like substance abuse?

If you suspect a colleague's impairment is compromising client safety, you have an ethical and often legal duty to report it confidentially to nursing administration.

Patient safety comes first.

Admin then handles notifying the board of nursing if necessary.

And workplace safety issues.

OSHA requires safe workplaces.

Employees can report violations confidentially to OSHA without fear of employer retaliation.

Lastly, sexual harassment.

It's illegal.

Includes unwelcome sexual conduct, creating a hostile environment.

Follow your agency's specific policies for reporting any incidents or concerns.

Okay, so source includes review questions, 11 through 20.

Let's quickly hit the concepts they test.

Sure.

Question 11 tests accurate, objective documentation.

12 is about prioritizing actions after a client fall.

Safety first, then document in the chart.

13 deals with implied consent in emergencies.

14 covers floating safely, communicate limitations, seek guidance.

15 advises against witnessing living wills due to potential conflicts of interest.

Question 16 clarifies incident reports are for risk management QI, not the client chart.

17 highlights the duty to report suspected negligence or impairment in a colleague.

18 is about respectful communication with grieving families.

19 identifies taking photos without consent as invasion of privacy.

And 20 reinforces the mandatory duty to report suspected elder abuse.

And there's a critical thinking scenario.

What should you do?

A client changes their mind about surgery right before.

The answer stresses.

First,

assess why they changed their mind.

Then stop any further prep.

Immediately notify the surgeon it's the surgeon's job to discuss risks, benefits, alternatives again.

Document everything carefully.

The client's statement, your assessment, notifying the provider.

Never proceed against the client's explicit refusal.

Respecting their right to refuse is paramount.

So wrapping this all up, we've covered a huge amount of ground on ethics and law in nursing.

From ethical principles like autonomy and beneficence to the Nurse Practice Act, standards of care, liability risks like negligence, client rights, informed consent, ATA confidentiality, safeguards like documentation and incident reports, advanced directives, and reporting duties.

It's all absolutely essential for providing care that is not only safe and effective, but also ethical and legally sound.

This deep dive, using the Saunders Review as our guide, should give you a really solid framework for understanding these critical areas.

We hope it's brought some clarity and practical insight into navigating these often complex situations you face in practice.

And as a final thought,

keep reflecting on those ethical principles.

How do autonomy, justice, beneficence, non -maleficence guide your actions?

Thinking critically about these helps navigate those gray areas.

And with that, we've thoroughly explored the key content on ethical and legal issues from the Saunders Comprehensive Review, 7th edition.

Thanks for joining us on the Deep Dive.