Chapter 24: Self-Regulation and Control in Personality

Loading audio…

ⓘ This audio and summary are simplified educational interpretations and are not a substitute for the original text.

If there is an issue with this chapter, please let us know → Contact Us

Self-Regulation and Control in Personality academic chapter redefines personality through the concept of self-regulation, using the principles of two interacting layers of feedback control processes to explain how individuals manage multiple, simultaneous goals over time,. The core mechanism is the feedback loop, which functions based on four elements: an input representing current perception, a reference value or standard (the goal), a comparator that detects any error signal or discrepancy, and an output function (behavior) that acts to reduce or enlarge that discrepancy,. Behavior is inherently goal-directed, structured in a hierarchy where abstract goals are achieved through the attainment of concrete sub-goals,. This behavioral layer is complemented by a second, parallel control loop that automatically governs affect. This second loop monitors the rate of progress in the action system—analogous to velocity—comparing it to an acceptable criterion rate. The resulting positive or negative valence of affect serves as the error signal for this system; positive feelings arise when performance is exceeding the expected standard, while negative feelings arise when performance is lagging behind. The affect system is crucial for adaptive functioning, ensuring responses are both quick and stable,. The model distinguishes between two affective dimensions related to approach and avoidance systems: approach systems can yield positive affects like eagerness and negative affects like frustration, while avoidance systems can yield positive affects like relief and negative affects like anxiety. A key finding is that positive affect leads to an automatic tendency to "coast," or reduce effort, because the system seeks to minimize all discrepancies, including exceeding the standard. This coasting tendency is adaptive because it facilitates satisficing across multiple simultaneous goals, preventing the wasteful over-optimization of one goal and allowing resources to shift to other priorities,. Furthermore, affect operates as a vital mechanism for priority management. Negative affects, such as frustration or anxiety related to an unattended goal, signal the need for the goal’s priority to increase and intrude upon awareness. Conversely, positive affects signal that a focal goal is currently being handled successfully enough that its priority can be temporarily downgraded, making the person more likely to shift attention to an alternative goal or a new opportunity,. When a goal becomes truly unattainable, a distinction is made between negative affects that increase effort (anger/frustration) and those that promote adaptive disengagement (sadness/depression), which conserves energy and allows for the eventual pursuit of alternative incentives,.