Chapter 11: A Wall Is a Hell of a Lot Better Than a War

Loading audio…

ⓘ This audio and summary are simplified educational interpretations and are not a substitute for the original text.

If there is an issue with this chapter, please let us know → Contact Us

Beschloss traces how Walter Ulbricht, East Germany's leader, persistently pressured Khrushchev to authorize a physical barrier to stop the massive exodus of refugees fleeing communist rule, and how Khrushchev ultimately approved the plan based on his assessment that the young American president would not risk military intervention. The midnight erection of barbed wire and concrete fundamentally transformed Berlin from an open city into a divided symbol of communist oppression, shocking Western observers who witnessed the sudden sealing of borders. Kennedy's response, or apparent lack thereof, constitutes a crucial aspect of Beschloss's analysis. The president privately concluded that accepting a wall represented a far superior outcome to military confrontation that could escalate into nuclear war, yet he maintained public silence for over a week, a strategic restraint that left allies and the American public uncertain about U.S. resolve. Kennedy deployed Vice President Lyndon Johnson and General Lucius Clay to West Berlin to provide reassurance through visible American military presence, while navigating complex diplomatic relationships with West German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, NATO partners, and his own State Department officials who held different views on confronting Soviet aggression. The chapter illuminates how Khrushchev's willingness to construct the wall, possibly signaled through backchannel communications with Soviet intelligence officer Georgy Bolshakov, reflected the Soviet leader's confidence that Kennedy would acquiesce to this fait accompli. Beschloss emphasizes how Cold War pragmatism often operated through silence and symbolic gestures rather than overt military posturing, revealing the psychological and political toll the Wall inflicted on Berliners and the tension it created within the Western alliance as different leaders questioned whether Washington's restraint reflected weakness or calculated restraint.